Having read at least 64 blogs on Galludet and, 15 world newpapers covering it, I go via consensus, and that consensus is the deaf at Galludet opposing the new dean are discriminating against her (Not leat because of an alleged affair with King !). They blew it.
Comments (3)
If it justifies the current 'not deaf enough stance' at Gallaudet, then it isn't relevant.
'Deafhood' what is that ?
Posted by Anonymous | May 12, 2006 7:48 PM
Thre is NOT a "not deaf enough" stance at Gallaudet.
That is NOT what it is about. That is a lie that JK has been selling to the media.
For the truth, please check. www.gallyfssa.org. What is under question here is 1) the flawed process of the BOT, and 2)her leadership.
Posted by Anonymous | May 13, 2006 2:09 AM
Having read at least 64 blogs on Galludet and, 15 world newpapers covering it, I go via consensus, and that consensus is the deaf at Galludet opposing the new dean are discriminating against her (Not leat because of an alleged affair with King !). They blew it.
Posted by Anonymous | May 13, 2006 10:27 AM