« Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse: Irish Deaf Schools | Main | Learning from California Being Scared of Love (Prop 8) »

Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)

The EHRC is the body for England, Wales and Scotland that is charged with the promotion of equality. From personal experience, in terms of meeting the needs of individuals it doesn't do this well (if you represent an organisation, your reality is distorted). Furthermore, how far removed it can be from deaf people. Ask yourself this: what has the EHRC done for you?

Recently the EHRC had a press release Commission's enforcement team takes on more than 300 cases in first 18 months, and goes onto state:

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has now used its enforcement powers on 337 occasions.

So I got my MP to ask such a question in parliament:

Lembit Öpik (Montgomeryshire, Liberal Democrat)

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality how many completed cases originating in (a) Wales, (b) Scotland and (c) England the Equality and Human Rights Commission has taken up on behalf of individuals since its inception; and how many such cases concerned (i) disability discrimination, (ii) sexual discrimination and (iii) racial discrimination.

Maria Eagle (Liverpool, Garston, Labour)

Between October 2007 and 31 March 2009, the Equality and Human Rights Commission undertook 203 completed cases on behalf of individuals:

(a) 191 cases originated from England;
(b) Eight cases originated from Scotland; and
(c) Four cases originated from Wales.
(i) 179 completed cases concerned disability discrimination;
(ii) 10 concerned sexual discrimination; and
(iii) 14 concerned racial discrimination.

Three cases concerned more than one strand of equality.

Okay! Let me get this straight. The glossy press release says 337 cases. The parliamentary written answer says 203. What gives? No synchronised statistics makes me think someone is lying somewhere. Place that on top of a huge annoyance, and one is not a happy bunny.

Next point. FOUR cases in Wales. Four? Hello? I would really like to know what the Welsh EHRC has been doing for the past eighteen months, and exactly how many millions are they being paid for seemingly next to nothing as far as output goes? Joe Public the taxpayer should be annoyed too, that's your money that's being wasted. Can anyone realistically accept a bill of millions (to run EHRC) to come up with four cases, value for money? You can talk policy until the cows come home, but without enforcement we're not going to get anywhere. And if someone out there really believes that's the the extent of discrimination in Wales, ha! Currently I have six open files, all instances of discrimination, just stuff I've experienced. I've approached the EHRC for mediation, and got nowhere. The result, they just wasted my time. More about this, maybe, in another post. The point is, that's just one individual: there's more out there.

Looking at the above figures, we have: 88.11% cases around disability, 4.9% relating to sexual discrimination, 6.86% pertaining to race and 1.47% of mixed strands.

The whole point of social policy is to take your casework. Spot trends. Take the major trend, and turn it into some major policy rethink plus campaigning. To adopt this approach, is not major rocket science, but rather common sense. Let trends speak, you can talk general policy streamlining all you like but they are no more than abstract ideas. Get led by practice.

Additionally, how come little news items that feature on the EHRC's news page relate to disability? If you see any mention of the EHRC in the media, it always seems to be about gender. Why isn't the public face of EHRC reflecting discrimination ratios? If you follow EHRC on Twitter, you'll understand the lack of disability updates.

And for a final bonus, let me ask you this. Where was the EHRC when deaf people complained about ITV (removal of regional BSL input for the news)? Where was the EHRC when deaf people complained about genetics and how the Department of Health completely failed to include deaf people in consultation? Where is the EHRC when deaf people are trying to campaign for updated telephone access? Exactly what does it understand about BSL recognition? So it goes on ....

And one last question: exactly why isn't the EHRC's website in BSL? The body that is supposed to take a lead against discrimination, is discriminating against BSL users. Instead you've got this tokenistic crap, and you still need to navigate the English first.

This body needs a serious leadership rethink because right now, its not working. EHRC, championing equality and human rights for all. Not.

Source:
They Work For You
Hansard

Comments (6)

I Keep reiterating the fact deaf people are NOT aware they have no rights of real note, they have been sucked in by charities acting for the state, and gone apathetic. I do believe the EHRC gets no deaf input, it does not surprise me at all. Do WE ever get any input ? The few campaigners for the deaf still left say they cannot engage with British deaf NOBODY can. Can we nag the ENHRC for being in the same position ?

Only one question. Do we carry on or leave these apathetic and lazy deaf people to it ? You cannot help those who don't want help, it has to come from them. Seems with all the twitters and facebook sites for the deaf, awareness via them is zilch.

Not only is the EHRC useless but they actually OPPRESS disabled people.

They support the proposals in the Gregg Review, which has a number of human rights breaches, including forcing disabled people into slavery. Even the JCHR has done more to protect us than the EHRC.

The EHRC - trampling over the human rights of disabled people.

La responsabilité politique du PS et du CDH dans le législations de communauté française de wallonnie et Bruxelles - le hypocrisie du PS et CDh

The legislative responsibility of the French Belgium's Parties of the laws made by the French community government of Wallone and Brussels of Belgium_La responsabilité politique du PS et du CDH dans le législations de communauté française de wallonne et Bruxelles - le hypocrisie du PS et CDh

Loi que discrimine la procédure d'équivalence de le gouvernement de communauté française de Belgique.
Loi que discrimine les étrangers même européens d'avoir bourse d'étude lorsqu'un parent pas travaillé en Belgique ou ne travail pas.

The legislative responsibility of the French Belgium's Parties of the laws made by the French community government of Wallone and Brussels of Belgium

Discriminating by mainstream/indirectly the equivalence procedure.
Discriminating even an European foreigner of having a scholarship if the parents didn't work or are not working in Belgium.


A été le PS et le CDh qui en majorité on propose et approuve le législations de procédure des équivalences et de bourse des études en communauté française de wallonne et Bruxelles de le et-membre de Belgique qui détermine:

Coercition des étudiants étrangers européen et non-européens d'avoir l'équivalence sans procédure illicite comme sans faire trop de démarches administratifs
et gratuit (sans payer les 124€ de taux administratifs) a partir de loi de la CFWB du 17 mai 1999 en réponse à la liberté législative interprétés dans l'article 2§4, de l'arrête royale du 20 juillet 1971.

Cette législation viole les droits, libertés et garanties, aussi comme les droits humaines des liberté, non-discrimination et accès à l'éducation, aussi comme le directive européen de non-discrimination spécialement comme ne type de discrimination indirecte ou par mainstreaming, le traite européen en certains maniéré, aussi comme discrimine les équivalences flamandes.

Autres législations ont été fait par le Communauté française par les même partis comme:


Discrimination d'avoir bourse des études à étudiants étrangers même si avec carte d'identité belge et même si de l'espace économique européen, dont doit être pressuposé de que lorsque le parents travaillent ou ont travaillé dans autre état-membre doit être le même chose que au Belgique mais ça n'est pas considéré par le Communauté française de Belgique.

Tous la législation discriminatoire a été applique par le www.cfwb.be sauf le exemple de le gouvernement de Flandre qui a une législation juste et non-discrimination spécialement pour étudier.

A TOUS A QUI CONCERNE LES SUJETS ICI dénoncé usé voter dans les élections dans les partis comme www.ecolo.be et www.mr.be, dont ceux ici sont les uniques que n'ont pas accordé la législation en application.

Merci à tous.


International Cybernetic Association Of Student's Rights - ICASR
Association International Cybernétique Des Droits Des Etudiants - AICDE

INTERNATIONAL CYBERNETIC ASSOCIATION OF FOREIGNERS STUDENTS RIGHTS'-ICAFSR
ASSOCIATION CYBERNÉTIQUE INTERNATIONAL DES DROITS DES ÉTUDIANTS ÉTRANGERS-ACIDEE


Note:Please report or resend this email to your government and international/European courts, institutions and organizations, even others associations in order to help.

P.S: s'il vous plait reporter cette situation à vous gouvernement, tribunaux nationaux, internationaux et européens, aussi comme à autres institutions inclusive
associations.

Said and Act : NO TO EURO-XENOPHOBIA or XENOPHOBIA.
Dit et agit: Non à l'EURO-XÉNOPHOBIE ou XÉNOPHOBIE.

Demand to your government reciprocity otherwise your government should acts as by reciprocity justification in the same act of illicit procedure to the Belgium's French community government diplomas.

ANY TRANSLATION OF THIS TEXT PLEASE GO TO:
http://babelfish.yahoo.com

The legislative responsibility of the French Belgium's Parties of the laws made by the French community government of Wallone and Brussels of Belgium_La responsabilité politique du PS et du CDH dans le législations de communauté française de wallonne et Bruxelles - le hypocrisie du PS et CDh

La responsabilité politique du PS et du CDH dans le législations de communauté française de wallonnie et Bruxelles - le hypocrisie du PS et CDh

Loi que discrimine la procédure d'équivalence de le gouvernement de communauté française de Belgique.
Loi que discrimine les étrangers même européens d'avoir bourse d'étude lorsqu'un parent pas travaillé en Belgique ou ne travail pas.

The legislative responsibility of the French Belgium's Parties of the laws made by the French community government of Wallone and Brussels of Belgium

Discriminating by mainstream/indirectly the equivalence procedure.
Discriminating even an European foreigner of having a scholarship if the parents didn't work or are not working in Belgium.


A été le PS et le CDh qui en majorité on propose et approuve le législations de procédure des équivalences et de bourse des études en communauté française de wallonne et Bruxelles de le et-membre de Belgique qui détermine:

Coercition des étudiants étrangers européen et non-européens d'avoir l'équivalence sans procédure illicite comme sans faire trop de démarches administratifs
et gratuit (sans payer les 124€ de taux administratifs) a partir de loi de la CFWB du 17 mai 1999 en réponse à la liberté législative interprétés dans l'article 2§4, de l'arrête royale du 20 juillet 1971.

Cette législation viole les droits, libertés et garanties, aussi comme les droits humaines des liberté, non-discrimination et accès à l'éducation, aussi comme le directive européen de non-discrimination spécialement comme ne type de discrimination indirecte ou par mainstreaming, le traite européen en certains maniéré, aussi comme discrimine les équivalences flamandes.

Autres législations ont été fait par le Communauté française par les même partis comme:


Discrimination d'avoir bourse des études à étudiants étrangers même si avec carte d'identité belge et même si de l'espace économique européen, dont doit être pressuposé de que lorsque le parents travaillent ou ont travaillé dans autre état-membre doit être le même chose que au Belgique mais ça n'est pas considéré par le Communauté française de Belgique.

Tous la législation discriminatoire a été applique par le www.cfwb.be sauf le exemple de le gouvernement de Flandre qui a une législation juste et non-discrimination spécialement pour étudier.

A TOUS A QUI CONCERNE LES SUJETS ICI dénoncé usé voter dans les élections dans les partis comme www.ecolo.be et www.mr.be, dont ceux ici sont les uniques que n'ont pas accordé la législation en application.

Merci à tous.


International Cybernetic Association Of Student's Rights - ICASR
Association International Cybernétique Des Droits Des Etudiants - AICDE

INTERNATIONAL CYBERNETIC ASSOCIATION OF FOREIGNERS STUDENTS RIGHTS'-ICAFSR
ASSOCIATION CYBERNÉTIQUE INTERNATIONAL DES DROITS DES ÉTUDIANTS ÉTRANGERS-ACIDEE


Note:Please report or resend this email to your government and international/European courts, institutions and organizations, even others associations in order to help.

P.S: s'il vous plait reporter cette situation à vous gouvernement, tribunaux nationaux, internationaux et européens, aussi comme à autres institutions inclusive
associations.

Said and Act : NO TO EURO-XENOPHOBIA or XENOPHOBIA.
Dit et agit: Non à l'EURO-XÉNOPHOBIE ou XÉNOPHOBIE.

Demand to your government reciprocity otherwise your government should acts as by reciprocity justification in the same act of illicit procedure to the Belgium's French community government diplomas.

ANY TRANSLATION OF THIS TEXT PLEASE GO TO:
http://babelfish.yahoo.com

Visit my website: http://racialabuse-houseoflords.com for the full story of racial hatred of my line manager Lorna McWilliam at the House of Lords(HOL). HOL disregarded my race complaints saying: 'RACISM IS EVERYWHERE EVEN IN CIVIL SERVICE, WE CANNOT CORRECT MISS MCWILLIAM, BECAUSE SHE BELONGS TO A DIFFERENT GENERATION'. This woman unlawfully withheld my remuenration by using cunning, deceitful tactics. I am now homeless, accrued debts and living in poverty. EHRC, LIBERTY DISREGARDED MY COMPLAINTS.


15/08/2009 16:13

To:

Dear Mr – Mrs
To whom it my concern

First over with your permission I would like your full attention consideration, respect from the start till the end of this correspondence.

I’m writing this in regard of the abused and breach of my human rights – racial & religious discriminations been victims following an evil false allegation with police corporation & Complicity ,breach of fairness & impartiality breach of transparency & independency, breach of integrity breach of neutrality, breach of professionalism,mistreatment,misconduct, and been held as slave & hostage, been victim of torture- intimidation - harassed , are base on grounds and facts that were done by the “British authority” police – immigration-Barrister-solicitors-prosecutions-probation on the ground I’m black – foreigner – Muslim” My aim is to fight nationally internationally and bring others, in order, based on truth, justice, righteousness, generosity, rather than wrongdoing in the exercise of power from whatever base that power derives “political, judicial, etc” to publicise the atrocities, oppression, discrimination, abuses I been victim by the police – solicitors – probation – prison – complainant – witness etc, and To campaign for redress and to support my action and self, for the abused and evil false malicious allegation I been victim for a crimes I did not commit and bring any parties involved to accomplices to justice and that to cooperate with other groups and individuals to the achievement of these aims and to campaign for justice regardless of my racial religious Interest and the rights for respect to my human rights as human being and respect of my colour and religions
Of been verbally abused, harassed, discriminated
What they do not like people doing to there national overseas they do not have to foreigner national that if they do not want see foreigner coming to there country they have to make it clear same as there PM State “ British jobs for British worker” that they don’t wanted no foreigner specially African, that is evil people involved in my case are lending the British country even they are contributing in an unhealthy , unwealthy society even more encouraging prostitution and person to make evil false allegation

According the justice system immigration officer should be independent and neutral during processing and handling case. However, in my case the law was breach, Immigration Corporation & complicity is strictly against the law. This is not my law, but the law establish by the government and the justice system and it apply to everyone. Therefore I bring this case to justice and justice should rule this matter as immigration handling is conducted without independency-transparency-neutrality-impartiality-professionalism and integrity with a pure lack of care, lack of respect and a pure insult in my self, a breach of my human rights not acceptable according to the united kingdom” if there is any equality-fairness-justice in this country & the world

The immigration link and guidance to cover the police-probation-witness-prison service is a pure racial discrimination and a breach of fairness and a total professional misconduct. Immigration interfering is prohibited.

I have right for respect for my private and family life there shall be no interference by immigration authority with the exercise of right, except such as those in accordance with the law and is necessary in democratic society in the interest of my security.

As a result of these facts and misconducts by the immigration, I believe and independent investigation should take place and a review of these racist false allegation and pure defamation.

I have been purely discriminated of my black skin and Muslim religion and my sex and my human rights, a breach of fairness and complicity of inequality. Immigration unprofessional misconduct is not acceptable in any democratic society especially in the 21 century, the immigration has responsibility to bring justice where needed but should never become comp lice with such serious false allegation-discrimination-defamation, lack of care, lack of respect.
The enjoyment of my rights and freedom as describe in the constitution, set forth in the convention shall be securely provided in a professional manner without discrimination on any ground such as sex-race-colour-religion-language-political and national origin. Race and religion should not in front of the judge or jury that the only thing that matters is justice.
That is a pure racial & religious discrimination and disrespectful-disgraceful-evil and unlawful arbitrary what the immigration is doing to me right now.

The immigration knew I submitted further representation on the 09-04-2007,10-05-2007,25-07-2007 that was considered under the marriage concession DP 3/96 and was approval and accepted by the home office on NOVEMBRE 2007 that I submitted the ILR ON 17-12-2007 at Dallas in front of Irene .
Respect is treating others the way you want to be treated
Respect is showing kindness and consideration
Respect is liking yourself enough to be yourself
Respect is accepting others for who they are

But the United Kingdom did voluntary, unlawfully-arbitrary breach the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms Rome, XI.1950 considering the universal declaration of human rights proclaimed by the general assembly of the united nation on 10-12-1948.

My rights to life shall be protected by law, no be deprived of my life intentionally.
My right to life shall be protected by law from unlawful – arbitrary detention.
My rights to life shall be protected against torture-inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

I been held in slavery and servitude and forced to perform compulsory labour.
I have a right to liberty and security .No one shall be deprived of his liberty.
My rights & freedoms as set forth in this convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed deliberately with pure discrimination , lack of care ,lack of respect, defamation by person acting in an official capacity.

No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal matter proceedings under the jurisdiction of the same state for an offence for which I has already spend my time of a crime I did not committed in accordance with the law and penal procedure of that state..
As a result of this terrible misconduct, I urge the international independent tribunal to take serious action on this matter and bring justice where it should be.

The enjoyment of my rights set forth by law shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such an s sex-race-colour-language-religion-political or other opinion-national origin-association with a minority-property-birth or other statue.
Convinced that my right to life is a basic value in democratic society is essential for the protection of this right and for the full recognition of the inherent dignity as a human being.

Immigration:

S 7 of the 1962 provides against deportation for long term resident ordinarily living in United Kingdom for 5years.
Legislation and materials immigration act act 1971,
Shall not be liable for deportation under s7, s3 (5) or (6) if at the time of secretary state’s decision he had the last five years been ordinarily resident in the united kingdom and shall not on convicted of an offence be recommended for deportation if at the time of the conviction he had last five years ordinarily resident in the united kingdom.
S 10 of the immigration act 1999
S 2 immigration appeal 1993
S 6 immigration act 2002
- The case law confirmed that the only further resident condition which can now be applied is that the proposed deported has ordinarily resident in United Kingdom for 5 years.
All namely incorporated and amended under the asylum and immigration act 1971 – 2002.
section 2 of the asylum and immigration appeal 1971 act 1993 provides nothings in the immigration rule within the meaning of the 1971 act shall lay down any practice with would be contrary to the European convention and united kingdom obligation’s under the convention.

Why on the 21-02-2009 my probation officer john Oldham visit at Manchester strange ways prison told me he has been send me by prison service in behalf of the home office to check my address where I been living after my release of I don’t have no immigration matter and state problem that now with there racism attitude that I’m determined to challenge under international in corporation and complicity to cover there crime I been unlawful arbitrary held in order to breach my human rights with even to assassinated


Human Rights:

Article 2 is relevant in case threatened of expulsion of my self from the united kingdom to risk of death applies the same standards to risk violation of article 3 as to article 3 namely that there is real risk, the risk my self in the case from gang member and politician seeking revenge to my self.
Article 3 this is an absolute rights the breach which cannot be justifies by any interest of the state 23 EHRR 413 that this even I was dangerous to national security cannot be expelled to face HARCH PENALTY- TORTURE OR HUMAN DEGRADING TREATMENT- PUNISHMENT – ILL TREATMENT.
There is substantial overlap between the treatment which from the substance of an asylum and treatment would breach article 3 if the element of an asylum claim fail then there is need an inquiry into whether expulsion will breach article 3 and as a refugee is define by the convention relating to the statue of refugee 1951 CSR as my self who being outside my country has a well founded fear of being prosecuted for my membership of former rebel – opposant politic and civil rights activist against women’s circumcise and mutilated and freedoms fighter.
The CSR is not part of domestic law but the asylum & immigration appeal act 1993 state that nothings in the immigration act rule and practices should contravene the CSR .The threshold is well founded and established with and arrest warrant from Senegalese prosecutor against my self.
Article 3 prohibited TORTURE OR INHUMAN DEGRADING TREATMENT this provision not only protects against the NAMELY INFLICTED BY BRITISH AUTHORITIES, but also protects my self against expulsion.
Were there is a real risk, unlike the CSR the protection offered by article 3 is absolute and applies regardless of my immigration’s history or criminal record.

Article 8:

Under directive 2004/38 union citizen’s mean any person having nationally of a member state and family member mean’s spouse, the partners with whom the union citizen’s has contracted a registered partnerships on the basis of the legislation of a member state, without prejudice & discrimination to the DIVORCE – ANNULEMENTS – TERMINATION of the union citizen’s marriage of HIS OR HER registered partnerships lasted 3 years, Spouse shall enjoy equality of rights and responsibilities of a private law character between them, and in their relations with their children as to marriage, during marriage and in the event of its dissolution.
shall not affect the rights of residence of HIS OR HER family members who are nationals of a member a states, shall acquire the right of permanent resident after residing legally for a period of five consecutive years, shall enjoy equal treatment with the member of that state within the scope of the treaty the benefit of this shall be extended to family member who are not nationals of a member state and who have the rights of residence or permanent residence as my self.

DIVORCE DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY INVALIDATE
AN APPICATION FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS
Any marriage based application for adjustment of status is not terminated automatically by a divorce prior to approval. That if an alien spouse married within of approval and filed to adjust status to conditional residence, the alien spouse would not be ineligible even though the alien spouse obtained a divorce before the adjustment of status was adjudicated.
The Immigration Service and the Immigration Court had previously limited fiancé visa holders to only obtain permanent residence through marriage to the fiancé who originally petitioned for them. This deprived the alien fiancée from adjusting on a petition based on a marriage to someone else on some other basis, such as a Labour Certification. The Government had always held that it needed 2 years of evidence to establish the good faith of the marriage, thereby rooting out marriage fraud. However, decision held that the statute was not intended to disallow alien fiancé who marry a U.K. citizen in good faith and file their application pursuant to the marriage in spite of a divorce from obtaining permanent residence. The Court also noted that the decision was not based on the fact that the Immigration Service stalled for two and one half years. Instead the Court based its decision on the fact that the fiancé spouse had fulfilled the statutory requirement time by marrying and then filing the application thereafter, thereby complying with the strict requirement of the statute.
The reasoning of the Court of Appeals appears to have focused on the good faith of the alien spouse completing the statutory requirements. The alien fiancé who comes to the U.K. in the good faith expectation of becoming a permanent resident then marriage to a U.K. citizen and then the U.K. citizen spouse fails and/or refuses to support a marriage application for the alien spouse should not make the alien spouse ineligible to receive permanent residence despite the divorce. Since divorce does not now lead to the automatic denial of a pending adjustment of status application, the failure and/or refusal of the citizen spouse to support an application after marriage should not prevent the alien spouse from receiving permanent residence or a showing of good faith. Otherwise, a citizen spouse could hold the alien spouse hostage to the citizen’s whim and caprice.
Children are also regarded as having a relationship of family life with the biological father even they do not live together and the ECTHR has repeatedly held that in the absence of exceptional circumstance of the parents child relationships automatically give rise to family life .Although the ECHR place high value of biological father as the basis family tie. The anti-discrimination provision of article 14 means that the martial statue of the parents should not make any difference to the decree of respect according to the family under article 8.
Article 8 makes no distinction between the legitimate and illegitimate family such distinction in article 1 and this is confirmed by article 14 with its prohibitions of discrimination grounded on birth it seems therefore in order to comply with article 8 immigration law should respect the relationships between child whether the family martial status and whether or not they are living together
Under BNA s1 British citizenships is acquires by birth in the united kingdom if the child’s parents are either British or settled in united kingdom, to be settled mean to be ordinarily resident in united kingdom without immigration restriction “my bay mum is without restriction and under the law as a dad with responsibility to care my children I’m without immigration restriction”
Section of the BNA 1981 deals with the acquisition of British citizenships by people born in united kingdom after commencent of the act on 01/01/1983 it provides that a person born in the united kingdom after commencent is a British if at the time of their birth their mother or father is British citizen or settled in united kingdom. The concept of respect for private life and family life in the context of article 8 is wide and included spouse-children ( whether legitimate or illegitimate) and relatives in relations to children, even father who a little or no contact with their children since birth can enjoy a right to family life with those children.

Barristers:
John broadly
refused to work along with the facts and evidence I given them in order to illustrate what’s true, he also mentioned I did have no chance to win do not know what to advice and did not provide any adequate support to help me fight the case so with the lack of care, respect, lack of expertise with Janice Cowan was telling she will be happy if she can have a men jump on her all night, therefore I decide to change solicitors since I knew they did not want to exert any efforts in my case, on 29-05-2008 I had requested adjourned during my plead day to change my legal team “abbey solicitors and barrister john broadly” this was at Manchester crown square in front of judge rudland,dispite the facts john broadly was dismiss from his service and Kristina Harrison solicitors was my new firm he still show up in court room on my next plea day,consequentely the judge told him that Mr Toure already change firm you not longer in charge of his case and you was dismiss to leave the court room however he in purpose deliberately lie and defamation and deform my plea state that I previously plead guilty on 29-05-2008 and I haven’t.

BOB SASTRY:
Were the barristers who succeed him I explained to him I was disappointed of my previous legal team and need his professionalism-integrity, expertise and provide him a outline of the facts & evidence which could direct him to defend me with fairness- impartiality. since the prosecution could not convict me with that evil malicious allegation, then on 26-08-2008 my trial day he state is not his job to advice me and he has been told by the prosecution they knew I didn’t do it on the fact a no erect penis can rape a women but they willing to drop that evil malicious allegation only if I plead guilty for sexual assault if not I will face 8years to 16 years in prison for a crime I didn’t not commit and refused to presented my personal analysis to the court and rush my case went for the easy money then he meet my family state I don’t have no chance to win that It was him to arrange with the prosecution for the sexual assaulted for less time in prison if not I will get 4years to 8years , then when we meet the first judge on charge my trial he ask why me make a deal if what my barrister & prosecution agree I was intimidate my complainant automatically he interrupt the judge but it was to later because my the judge said it in front my family, in the judge statement it was me to instruct my legal team to collected by forensic analysis those phone called my complainant made to my family confessed I didn’t no wrong doing to her that she was willing to clear the messed she created to went the police and drop that evil allegation that the next day she called again confessed she has been told by the police she’s to later to drop that evil malicious allegation I did not commit.
I have witness for there wrong doing this a pure racial & religious discrimination.


Doctors Michelle evision & Amrin Rahuf
as both pretend to be forensic physician state was able to read and take photocopies of the log which describes, even amrin rahuf state haleema did not complaint for anything, however state on her hand verbatim record & indictment
“he went down on me sucked until I was wet” .
“I feel like I shouldn’t not go there & messed him around “she told both doctors & police he penetrate with a no erect penis even when we watch porno together”.
-She kicked him away, was in fear, was defiantly, however a question to ask who did it?
-Since when a no erect penis can penetrate a vagina?
-What make her wet? Because medically a women freak of a very unusual excepted event
behave or cause to behave in a wild and irrational way and fear of an unpleasant emotion
caused by the threat of danger, pain or harm caused by impending danger something that cause
- what the unqualified doctors did not know is women body are wonderful – adaptable but as tough she not as aroused and ready for sex as she need to be consequently it hurt and she tense up
- physiological culmination of sexual stimulation marked by general release of muscular tension and waves of the females and ejaculations
distress with crying of very great it would be a crying shame and frighten of cause to be afraid drive away by fear threatened or intimidate with defiantly resist bodily and traumatised.
g- Same night she was ready to join her boyfriend for having sex.
-she states he did not take my clothes off
-who rape at 2pm
-why she refused more consultation
-since when on 09-03-2008 was dark and raining at 2pm in Manchester
-how she can go have sex with someone she doesn’t not know
- Since when can’t confirmed a no erect penis but both doctors state they can confirmed even when haleema she been penetrate with a no erect penis.
-who take her clothes off.

Police:
According the justice system police officer should be independent and neutral during indictment and interview. However in my case the law was breach and the officer manipulated the system and advice my complainant to change her min and further influence her to strengthen their case. This evil false malicious defamation is described:
During my complainant indictment, she first told the police that she was rape and she did not know who rape, don’t know where he lived, don’t know the name, she also told the police that she never had sex with that person or sleep together, further during the interview she admit knowing Toure and even describe Toure the police Toure full setting flat, she also reveal that was in relationship and we had sex several time and Toure flat was a comfortable place to be even she told then Toure daily routine, she told then which school, we went together and my work place and previously I was chef.
She reveal the police that evil false malicious allegation was her idea, but she was pressure by her women friend and reconciliated boy friend and the police evil false malicious defamation that I was a dangerous men without having no records of my present or past record.
I have a clean record never committed crime or harm to anyone, even her did denied the police evil false malicious allegation, SO WHERE FROM THESE ALLEGATION FOR THE POLICE FROM?
Still during the indictment my complainant told the police I DIDN’T THINK HE DID IT, THE POLICE REPLY DON’T TALK ABOUT THAT THIS IS LIKE YOUR STATEMENT.
The police are complicit and play a leading role to influence and fear my complainant about my persona, Police Corporation & complicity is strictly against the law, this is not my law but the law establish by the government & justice system and it apply to everyone, therefore I take this to the international and justice should rule this serious matter.
As police investigation was conducted without independency-transparency-integrity-neutraity-impartiality-professionalism- a breach of human rights not acceptable according the united kingdom laws and any others international laws or others country laws.
The police link and guidance to influence and help shape her false evil malicious allegation is a pure discrimination & breach of fairness, mistreatment, a total misconduct, police interfering is prohibited and as a innocent a blame the police for what happened to me of there racial discrimination.
She clearly lie to the police and the police help her as she told then she did not know where I lived nevertheless she took then my place without getting lost at 17h45mn and pretend she was dark &raining can’t see anything at 3pm day after her false evil claim..
She was strongly influence and lead by the police that I’m dangerous person and I don’t know anywhere in the world where police force can make such serious allegation to a person without investigation or any previous record, even with a person previous records they don’t have no right to interfering..
I have been discriminated of my human rights, breach of fairness & impartiality, complicity of inequality, police unprofessionally and misconduct, mistreatment is not acceptable in any democratic society, especially in the 21 century and in United Kingdom.
The police has a responsibility to bring justice where needed, but should never influence or become complicit in providing criminal allegation.
- Must be in the first police report they report we had domestic problem
- Secondly all sorted now
- Thirdly a evil false allegation of rape
- Sexual assaulted
- “ is to assassinated me to cover there crime or to set up me to take there vengeance for the simple reason is someone make such evil allegation is determined to finish off “


Probation officer:
during pre-sentence and after sentence and during licence time should assisted, educated for any offender rehabilitation for to integrated the society for a better healthy-wealthy living society, but not punishment to lead anyone back to prison because prison is about education – rehabilitation - training and not punishment, however in my case the probation manipulated the system and advice the judge I was dangerous and suggest that a custodial sentence is appropriate in terms of punishment protecting the public and restriction of my liberty and understand my complainant suffered pain was psychologically affected, being traumatised and in fear for her safety” as you her indictment she refuted all evil false allegation make by the police and probation”.
Probation corporation & complicity is strictly against the laws and a pure racial discrimination – defamation – corporation & complicity breach of my human rights – breach of fairness & impartiality of knowing she clearly lie to the police that the police make a serious allegation with a pure discrimination, even the medical report did contrary there false allegation that if it was the case she will never be wet.

- My complainant:
A runaway from her up to 100 miles her family house and moral morass women I was helping end homeless in the street without any penny to survive for family breakdown and dream of the big city with a poor child relationships with her parents was common among homeless, prostitutes etc.. With antisocial behaviour that I was taking care of her to tackle poor parenting.unhealthy-unwealthy social life for a better life.
As clearly she make a false evil allegation lied with the Police Corporation & complicity with her recon ciliated boy friend & women’s friends and they all with disgraceful & disrespectful manipulated and advice her to change and made a fake evil false allegation that she give false statement to the police that the police help shape her allegation and she misleading everyone with police corporation & complicity and clearly discriminated me on page 30 state she didn’t her friend husband didn’t know that it was seeing a black guy and it look kinda in our community so I know I have to keep him away from my friend and her husband, then that same friend state we meet him with my permission front the house and we did call each others and further more she state my self and my complainant we did meet several time a week and get on well As she clearly make a false allegation lie to the the public authority with police corporation & complicity.

- Zakkia as a friend & witness:
If straight way they meet my complainant told her I did raped her why when she report to the police we have domestic problem in her first police report, why she said all sorted then thirdly they said it was raped with a no erect penis and she accused me of abused her – hurt her.

Sabia nasir:
She used to call me day & night with there evil allegation she called me as a black and promises to be witness to help her


Prison service:

A – Medical issue:
Prisoner retain certain basis rights which survive despite imprisonment the rights of access to the courts and of respects for one’s bodily integrity that is not to be assaulted are such fundamental rights, others may be recognised as the laws develops. As of April 2003 responsibility for funding prison health service shifted from the home office to the department of health, this was the first step in a five years process that will see prison health become part of the national health service (NHS) .Primary care trust will then become responsible for the commissioning and provision of health service to prisoners in their area. For the time being, however convicted prisoner remain in the care of the prison medical service which is not part of the NHS do not therefore have the rights to consult the doctor of they choice, however medical service has accepted that prisoner medical care is provided by outside GPS, who visited the prison on a daily basis if you part the legal proceeding an independent doctors may visit where an examination is relevant to those proceeding, but under the basis of the human right act I been out of medical treatment for 17 months while I was at Manchester prison of having chest pain- ribs pain and stomach pain & cramp did affecting me really that all my complaint and solicitors was turn down without success
“29-05-2008/10-09-2008/17-09-2008/02-12-2008/09-12-2008/23-12-2008 with a pure lack of care & respect link as well with a pure discrimination and professional negligence and misconduct.
That now I have high cholesterol and COAD of long disease illness.”

B – Mail:
Mail is censored in high security prison and for all category a prisoners “I was cat C”, but otherwise letter not routinely be read, complainant about prisoners treatment are no longer prohibited and letter whether to MPS or MEPS,ECJR or to others reputable organisation and letter under rule 39 applies & private confidential is suspected should be opened on my presence that letter between earlier organisation name are protected from interference not be read or opened whether or not legal proceeding have issued” that the prison did opened up to 35 of my letter”
C – Telephone
Foreigner national prisoner are entitled to £10.00 of having no social credit but 6 times they refused to give me my £10.00 credit I was entitled.
D – A officer did take Mr President OBAMA off the walls then write “fuck”
E – I been serve food by an officer at Ramadan time 2008
F – I been abused with swear fucking convicted prisoner, etc.

Detention:
As I’m in special diet menu for health problem about 2 weeks I been eating only chips & bean with an extremely serious abused one the staff did ticks “yes” I have to eat salt spicy etc were I doctors state I have to stopped eating those thing then went to the health care state is me to do tick that I have to sure my personal file to the nurse she can believe I didn’t it was one of the staff.

The cynicism

is word are very powerful and untrue words are very dangerous, this commandment is not just about giving false testimony in court, it’s about all forms of untruths unfortunately lying has become a moderns disease, apart from the individual consequence of every lie the overall effect of this is to breed cynicism and mistrust about every statement made in my case by the police – prosecution – probation – complainant – witness – barrister – solicitors etc with a pure discrimination.


This is a serious matter the justice with independence-transparency-impartiality- equally has to solve and I need appropriated medical treatment I can’t have in prison or detention.

I been living in this country for 7 years and believe my self I been a greater citizen good characters-attitude- manoeurs -honesty-integrity-brilliant-descent of being independent the quality of being honest and morally upright with treating all equally an ability and skill excepted of a professional ,human and the condition being transparent that responsible for my action and excepted to explain them with a conducive public good with contributing and helping toward, when I arrived in united kingdom is to give my loyalty to the united kingdom and respected its rights and freedoms and will upholds its democratic values to observes its laws faithfully and fulfil my duties and obligations as a citizen and human being and it will be my residence for the rest my life and I intend to do so and never failed to do so.

Internationally I will take any action to solve this in a peaceful way because everything is taking away from me for a crime I did not commit and you should know & understand such treatment- discrimination and feeling can make me react and to be the one I’m not and do not wanted to be again that the only thing can solve this is my release to get back my freedom because everything is taking away from me for a crime I did not commit has been send to prison as I’m a black-Muslim-foreigner national that I been torture- mistreated- ill treated discriminated – intimidated – harassed ridiculed held in hostage- humiliated that Justice should rule to clear me for any wrong doing if there any justice in this country and to clarified the rule played the police – probation – Barristers – Solicitors Prison service. Otherwise I know once out of this country what action to take. For the simple reason as human being no one gone accepted we treated you or your family the way I been treated of been wrongly send to prison and held and hostage by the immigration to cover the public authority evil crime they committed against my self, is something I will never ever forget or forgive.

“And what reasons have you that you should not fight in the way of Allah and of the weak among the men and the women and the children, (of) those who say: Our Lord! Cause us to go forth from this town, whose people are oppressors, and give us from Thee a guardian and give us from Thee a helper”


I WIIL APPRECIATED YOUR IMMEDIATE ASSISTANCE TO ENDEAVOUR THE UNFAIRNESS & INJUSTICE I BEEN VICTIM

YOUR SINCERELY & FAITHFUL

Mr Toure
CID 1781676
COLNBROOK BY-PASS
HARMONDSWORTH
WEST DRAYRON
UB7 0FX
TEL/00447775266999

New Here?

Hello! We're UK based, more about GOD.

This page only has one post (posted on May 21, 2009 2:39 PM). For more visit the main page.

Don't miss new content, subscribe to our feed.

  feed.png   Posts Feed
  feed.png   Comments Feed

[Don't know what RSS is? Watch this subtitled video.]

Paying the Host Bill




Creative Commons License

Usually the content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence, unless specified otherwise.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33