The ins and outs I don't relate to (Australia is half a world away), just the underlying theme of how deaf people can be treated.

I read this post, Going Going Gone?? on The Rebuttal this morning. Go read it.

It struck me that it mirrored a lot of what happens in the UK. Deaf organisations controlling deaf people, when they are supposed to exist to "help" or "empower" them. In fact, they frequently do quite the opposite. I first encountered this Control Freaks R Us mentality around 1998, where quite frankly it was my biggest culture shock where I've witnessed it even pushing a descent into mental illness. I had grown up in the mainstream and also my legal training promoted freedom of thought, the ability to question and etc. You know, all the boxes for a healthy society and hey last time I checked we live in a democracy. This isn't supposed to be a dictatorship. Except, there can be a sit down, shut up and do as you're told mentality.

So The Rebuttal's post has been deleted. However, nothing gets deleted on the internet. It is a waste of time and just draws attention to the issue. Google's cache allowed me to retrieve it. Here goes:

26 Feburary 2012
Going Going Gone????

The Rebuttal has received a letter concerning the future of the grand ‘262’ building that is the home of the SA Deaf Community. Yet again it seems the future of the ‘262’ building is under threat. The building, ‘262’, as it is affectionately known, has been home to the Deaf community for almost a hundred years. The first Deaf girl I ever kissed was at ‘262’. My first job in the deaf sector was at ‘262’ and I nearly married the receptionist from ‘262’. I also sat on the Board of the then Royal South Australian Deaf Society for three years in the early 1990’s. My affection for the building and the community runs deep. So it is with great concern and sadness that I hear that the building is under threat yet again.

My attachment to ‘262’ is nothing compared to many others in the SA Deaf community. For many of them the building has been their rock since they were babes. Their parents would have met there. Some would have actually got married upstairs in the chapel. This chapel, with its curved and rising seats, was specially designed for Deaf people. Others would have used the building as their central meeting spot throughout their lives right up to joining the Senior Citizens Group. I love the Senior Citizens Group. When I worked there I would sneak out at lunch time to hear stories of the past from brilliant story tellers such as Clarrie and Alfred. The tale of Bruce Muller riding his motorcycle up the stairs is legendary. (I am assured it is true, but like many legends it may have taken a life of its own over the years.)

BUT ENOUGH – It almost sounds like I am writing the eulogy of this grand old building. Sadly this may actually be the case. Having been on the Board at the Royal SA Deaf Society I fully understand that maintaining the old dear is not a cheap job. Attempts over the years to raise money through leasing parts of building, selling adjoining land or establishing business initiatives have not led to long term sustainability of ‘262’. Recently there was the disastrous attempt to set up second hand clothing shops. Currently there is a hearing technology business called Can Do Hearing . The success of this business is unknown. However, if the rumours are true, cash flow created by Can Do Hearing is not enough to maintain ‘262’

At the crux of the matter appears to be a cash flow problem. Without cash the ‘262’ cannot stay open. Unfortunately when the Deaf SA entered into a partnership with Townsend House to stay afloat it gave away its autonomy by necessity. Sure it was a “business partnership” but the bottom line was and remains that the Royal SA Deaf Society, (now known as Deaf Can Do), appears to have very little capital and without Townsend House they are sunk. Townsend House really has all the control.

It seems that a number of suggestions are being put forward to keep ‘262’ viable. I am told that there has been given consideration to building apartments out the back where the Deaf Club now stands. A good money spinner but what is to happen to the Deaf club and the spiritual home of the Deaf community? Will it be set up somewhere else? There is consideration to the leasing of the building to whoever is willing to pay a premium. If so what access will the Deaf community have to their chapel, their club rooms and their hall? There is a suggestion that the building will be a kind of ‘clinic’ – For what? I am not sure. The crucial question is. - If any of this happens, what access will the Deaf community have to the building?

According to the letter we have received there is also a suggestion that the Deaf community will receive a ‘loan’. It seems the idea is that they will be provided with a loan and be fully responsible for ‘262’. The fear is that Townsend House will wash its hands of any responsibility. The fear is that funds from the loan will only allow them to survive for two to three months. On top of this, with so little capital, it is not known how the loan can be repaid. Unless, in that short time frame, the South Australian Deaf community can suddenly find access to funding it is possible that this strategy will be the final nail in the coffin.

There is seems to be a crisis happening. Decisions, quick decisions have to be made. Ideally one would consult widely and come up with solutions that involve input from the SA Deaf community. From the information received it looks like the time for consulting has passed and unless funding and solutions can be obtained quickly ’262’ could be gone by June.

This may all be well far off the mark. BUT a group of concerned Deaf people have seen fit to contact The Rebuttal to bring attention to the situation. They are clearly very worried and in need of assurance or at least the truth. What that truth is we do not know. Now is the time for openness and discussions. Get this in the open and let the South Australian Deaf community know what is happening. These discussions have to get out of the Board room and out into the community. Only then can the speculation be ended.

The situation at ‘262’ is not unique. There is a similar situation in Victoria with the historic Bluestone Building that hosts Deaf Children Australia. The cost of maintaining this beautiful old building is in the millions of dollars and it is a cost that Deaf Children Australia is trying to meet. Like the management of ‘262’ they have tried numerous ways to raise funds. They have leased parts of the building. They have set up businesses like Sign On Employment and they are currently trying to sell parts of the building and its land to raise funds that can be invested to retain and maintain the building.

The latter strategy has not been without controversy. The historic Victorian School for the Deaf do not want any sale to proceed because it encroaches upon facilities they see as vital to their school. They have protested and claimed that areas put up for sale are crown land. This may well be the case but the strategy of Deaf Children Australia has been to KEEP the building and retain its history and heritage. To do this sacrifices have to be made. It is difficult to please everyone but one thing is sure and that is that no business can afford to lose millions on an asset every year and expect to survive.

There is also a major difference between Deaf Children Australia and ‘262’ in that Deaf Children Australia have capital and they are looking to the long term to find a way for the Bluestone Building to survive. The crisis of ‘262’ is different. There is no capital, no money and the ‘business partner’, this being Townsend House, has no wish to lose any more money. After all they only became a partner to ‘help’ not to lose hard earned money. The cynic might say that they saw an opportunity to profit but now that this looks unlikely they are looking to cut the ‘partnership’ adrift. Only through transparent communication can they put to bed this type of speculation.

The more immediate crisis is the future of SA Deaf Community. What is to happen to them? If ‘262’ is leased out or sold where will they go? A short-term loan is not going to help them. They need a plan and assurance for the future. At the moment this is not being provided and they are very worried.

Other Deaf societies around Australia have had to sell up and move. Other Deaf societies around Australia have had to cry for help. In crying for this help, and in their scramble to survive, they often have forgotten the Deaf community. Sydney lost its Deaf club and the Deaf community there became fragmented and dispersed. Although the NSW Deaf community is showing signs of recovery the damage has taken years to repair. Victoria sold up as well. Little thought was given to the importance of the Deaf community centre. It has a farcical situation where after 6pm, if community groups use the JM Lovett Centre someone must go down the elevator with a security card to let other people in. They must also compete with other groups for use of the rooms, there is no autonomy. Currently there are discussions about developing a HUB for the Victorian Deaf community. Let us hope that this takes off. The situation in other states is unknown but whenever these ‘business’ decisions are made it always seems that the Deaf community are the whipping boys.

In 2007 the SA Deaf community almost lost ‘262’. It was saved by the development of the ’partnership’ with Townsend House. At the time the President of SA Deaf and the CEO of Townsend House assured the Deaf community that ‘262’ would never be sold. In retrospect this may have been more bravado than sensible.

It may well be that’262’ cannot be saved. It has not been for the want of trying. But South Australia is in a unique position in that it can learn from the mistakes of other states. The Deaf community centre, the history it maintains and the identity it brings are crucial to the Deaf community. If ‘262’ must go, and this may well be the case, let’s make sure that funds are invested to ensure a strong base and future for the SA Deaf community. In the ideal world this will be at ‘262’and if it cannot be there the powers that be need to make sure a significant investment is made in the SA Deaf community. The Board of the Deaf Society (Deaf Can Do) and Townsend House need to start consulting with the wider SA Deaf community and now! Only through significant investment can the Deaf community retain its autonomy, history, identity and more importantly its viability. ‘262’ was set up for the SA Deaf community. Let’s hope that the decision makers make sure, whatever decision is made, that any profits made and any developments entered into are used to secure the long term future of the SA Deaf Community.

And as for those who try to control deaf people, you should be ashamed. As for deaf people, you are not supposed to be prisoners nor caged birds.

In this post, I will focus on why do Deaf people claim DLA? Exactly what is the additional expense? Over the years, I've seen much commentary from Deaf people should use it to pay for interpreters only, to it is bribe money and it is not a rights based benefit. And so the long list goes on. More to challenge this below.

What does the law say?

The enabling Act for DLA is the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992. The relevant part for DLA is s.72.

s.72(1)(a)(i):

he requires in connection with his bodily functions attention from another person for a significant portion of the day (whether during a single period or a number of periods

This would entitle you to get lower rate of DLA.

s.72(1)(b)(i):

frequent attention throughout the day in connection with his bodily functions

Which entitles someone to claim middle rate DLA.

The difference between the two rates, being the frequency of attention which needs to relate to body functions. How you get that attention, is part and package of someone's independence. No one size fits all.

That is the law, there is nothing in the above legislation to say that DLA needs to be spent on interpreters. Parliament has not prescribed anything as to how this money should be spent. The confusion starts around Cockburn v. Chief Adjudication Officer and Another and Secretary of State for Social Services v. Fairey (1997) which talks about interpreters. Unfortuntely, those less versed in law take this to mean it is the parameters of what DLA is rather than proving a specific point of law and circumstances that was before the court.

What is attention? And more to the point, what is additional expense arising out of attention?

Here I'm going to write about myself, because it is easier. I claim DLA and I also live in a rural area. Where I live, if a hearing person wants to socialise - you know maintain their basic wellbeing, they walk to the local pub. Within 5-10 minutes you have a choice of eleven pubs, five sports clubs. Or they go to church (churches in this area provide community functions). Or join a local society. Or they take a class at the local sports centre. Or chat to locals on the street. Total cost = usually 0p, just walk there and more importantly interact with others.

Not a single person in my town (apart from me) is able to use BSL. Which means I cannot access anything. Zilch, nadda. Services providing social orientated activities is so small, that it falls outside the scope of legislation of being "reasonable" to make adjustments in respect of communication support.

The nearest interpreter to me - who is able to deal with Welsh place names amongst other things, is a 150 mile round trip. And not doable via public transport. In other words, transport costs which are astronomical on any interpreting bill.

The last social accessible function in my county was in October 2010, and a sixty mile round trip. The only social event before that which I am aware of being accessible, was in 1997, i.e. fifteen years ago and thirty miles of travelling.

Theatre wise, there has been TWO accessible performances 'local' to me in Wales, IN MY ENTIRE LIFETIME. One was last month (which was actually in England but only 100 miles!), the other was two years ago (sixty miles).

There is a deaf and hard of hearing club in town - meets once a month. It is based in an old people's home and everyone there is something like between the ages of eighty and one hundred and something. They are newly hard of hearing, and are interested in learning how to lipread. I've only been once, they ran a lipreading class. Nothing wrong with that but apart from being polite, I do not have anything in common.

Deaf club. Nearest one to me is (was?) fifty miles away. Once a month. Got there, OAPs sitting round the room drinking tea, speaking. Deaf people - there were three. They watched television. One hundred mile round trip to watch tv, no thanks.

The underlying theme here is isolation. To combat this I need to travel. Some people might say, free! Deaf people get free transport, what are you complaining about? For me to get to say, Cardiff on the bus it would take me four hours and twenty five minutes. One way. If you get the first bus of the day, you arrive in Cardiff at 1210. The last bus from Cardiff leaves at 1255 - leaving you with a whooping 45 minutes in Cardiff. Public transport wise, the only viable option is you stay overnight, and necessitates a stay in Cardiff (costs money).

If I got a train (cost £40+), I live ten miles from the nearest train station (obviously I need transport to get to/from). The journey time then takes between five and six hours one way. The latest time you can leave Cardiff using public transport (to get home) is 1430. Yes that's right, half past two in the afternoon.

The buses to everywhere finish at around 5.30pm and run every two hours. Not viable if you need to be there for say, 6.30pm. There are some parts where I live, the buses run once a week.

So free public transport is not a viable solution, and there is a need to pay to get somewhere (and usually by car, as bad as it is environment wise).

For a service to come under the Equality Act and to provide access for me, they need to be big enough to absorb the cost of paying for an interpreter. In legal speak, for the cost to be 'reasonable'. This means I've approached bigger service providers outside my immediate area. Not because it necessarily is my first choice of place to attend, rather it is the nearest place where I get the chance to even feel like I'm part of society. When such people have booked and paid for an interpreter, there still leaves the issue of me getting to venue with the interpreter. Travel is not free and DLA is towards paying for interaction others take for granted. Hearing people around me do not have to absorb this additional cost just to gain meaningful interaction with humans.

Deaf people living in rural areas tend to spend money on travel, just to maintain basic wellbeing. Far from the stereotype of boozing it up in Blackpool, it is just basic human contact. And it happens every few months because practicalities can be through the roof.

So DLA allows me some financial independence to manage my own needs. DLA is not perfect, it doesn't solve anything but it is a damn sight more than nothing. And it can mean the difference between existing (or being alive) and having a basic life. There is only so much isolation any human can tolerate. Here I am adapting my behaviour just to maintain some contact that other people readily take for granted. That chat in the street, your local pub, community centre or whatever hearing people do but will not even notice.

DLA is not there specifically to pay for an interpreter. If people want to use it to pay for an interpreter or communication support then good for them. However, there is nothing prescribed in current legislation towards this and each person's attention will be different. The point is autonomy.

On a broader note. Deaf events, e.g. North / South Wales Deaf Golf - could be said to be an example of wellbeing. On a superficial level it might look like DLA is party money. However, the reality is this provides exactly the same function as hearing people going to their nearest golf club (a couple of miles down the road). Deaf people have to travel to achieve the same (petrol, hotel). Socialisation matters as a cornerstone of wellbeing, without which then it just becomes a dent not only in mental health services but more people unable to work (due to mental illness). For the record, I don't play golf.

Another thing I would like to point out here, many people frame Deaf life on the reality of what happens in London. Newsflash: the M25 is not the parameter of the UK. What is the norm in London, is not the reality everywhere. If you live in London it is extremely easy to live in a bubble. This isn't just limited to social activities but extends into employment and training. Within London in part there exists a deaf diaspora and there is somewhat a critical mass, which makes deaf experience perhaps unique. Policy written by deaf organisations can be very skewed because of a London bias, which ultimately hurts those living elsewhere.

If you're still not convinced, here is some questions (from a deaf perspective):

1. If you were a hearing person, might your income be higher? Yes or no.

2. Not had the chance to negotiate the a price for something (car, building work, whatever) because it requires spoken English, and it is easier just to pay up? i.e. you end up paying higher? Yes or no.

3. Missed out on educational opportunties, because of lack of access? Knock on effect for the rest of your life (you know, you can't change those grades, from er, twenty years ago when there was no access). Yes or no.

4. Been ripped off by something or charged higher, but not challenged because communication enters the equation? i.e. you pay more. Yes or no.

5. Travelled somewhere (train perhaps) to meet someone you can communicate easily with? To meet someone who 'gets' you? Or just to get a fix of someone who can use your language? Stayed over somewhere too, the journey isn't doable in one day. Yes or no.

6. Paid a higher broadband tariff because you're online more (maybe need to use BSL)? Yes or no.

7. Missed out on networking / experience opportunities, say the local pub or local society. Knock on effect, you don't get offered an unadvertised job or be the friend of e.g. a local plumber (cheap rates)? Yes or no.

8. Had to drag along a local family member / friend with you, to assist with communication. In the car, this is extra weight in petrol, or paid an additional admission ticket? Yes or no.

9. Your car has broken down and you received a large bill because you didn't hear the engine making a noise? Yes or no.

10. Heating has been playing up for weeks, but you were totally unaware of it? Yes or no.

11. You flooded the entire house, because you left the tap running? Perhaps the ceiling caved in. Yes or no.

12. Checked your written English for a long time afterwards, to check you've not made some obvious mistakes. (When you could have been doing something else constructive, including earning money). Yes or no

13. You spent lots of time campaigning, just to get basic no frills access. You know, please can I have an interpreter, subtitles or please can you provide another means of contact other than the telephone. Also because you've had enough, you've asked your friend/family to help arguing or you might have sought out local advice services. (Who pays for this time?) Yes or no.

14. Some random person keeps insisting on calling you on a voice phone. Maybe you spend a long time tracking this down or trying to stop those calls. Yes or no.

(There's more I can think of but will stop there - people get the picture).

If you're answered yes to any of the above, then there is an obvious economic impact to who you happen to be. I could get into various arguments here around Deaf people as an alternative existence, however, when it comes to standard of living your benchmark is the local society you happen to live in. Whatever way you look at it, DLA is a welfare benefit and is around absorbing the cost of the need for attention. Attention doesn't necessarily mean an interpreter, it can mean going somewhere to get attention to suit you (language and culture or accessibility in non benefit speak).

Any application for DLA would not succeed on the points above, you need to prove attention is frequent throughout the day which relates to a body function. The point I'm trying to illustrate here relates to financial inequality. Deaf people happen to absorb the majority of the economic implications around inaccessibility - no DLA does not financially compensate properly any of the above plus more. The question is, should the government make a contribution? And why is it in society's interests to do so?

This of course is going to change, the government wants to reduce the number of people claiming DLA when this changes to PIP. More about that, perhaps, in another post. Here there is a need to just spell out economic disparity, far too often overlooked and frowned upon.

This is yet another in a long running line up of the BBC (and the rest of the media) attacking certain adults. Which is curious, since last night was BBC Children in Need and the BBC raised money for disabled or sick children. (I am ignoring other arguments here). Except, when the same children reach the age of 18 years - in other words adults - perception changes. Should they need assistance when they become an adult, then they are stereotyped as benefit scroungers.

And no, the government doesn't just not attack adults, try this this petition as a starting point. So whilst you and your mates are busy raising money for children, a lot of it is about subsidising the government's cutting back of services. It shifts the axis from rights towards charity and begging.

So, we have the BBC News twitter feed, retweeting tweets such as:

Welfare reform minister Lord Freud: Current sickness system is 'an incubator for lifelong idleness for far too many people' #sickpay

Meanwhile there are no retweets giving opposing opinion. You make up your mind re biased reporting.

(At this point I cannot understand the BBC and I suspect they are trying to give the impression of being more right wing, due to threats of their own funding - which again leads to questions around free from political bias).

To get onto the point of the the article. It states, "A survey suggested 77% of GPs had admitted they signed people off sick for reasons other than their physical health, the report authors told the BBC." Physical health does not include mental health, and presumably the remainder of those signed off sick have been done so for mental health reasons. If so, then the reporting itself is misleading and implies. The public not familiar with language, might assume the remainder of people are a fraud by a simple lack of inclusion of information.

Stereotyping by the media has already been brought up by the National Union of Journalists, see here for more information.

The next part that raises concern:

If the recommendations are accepted people who are signed off sick would also be put on to Job Seekers' Allowance, instead of Employment Support Allowance, for a period of three months.

Here the government is proposing you to claim JSA when you perhaps might be at your most vulnerable. JSA involves turning up to the job centre each week, signing on, using the phones there, no being eligible for any form of assistance (when you perhaps might need it most).

So let's use an example, a hearing person who has lost all of their hearing overnight. They have never functioned without hearing before, and suddenly they are faced with no communication skills to manage their new situation, they don't know anything about practicalities and emotionally they've been hit by a frieght train. Suicidal thoughts amongst other things, are not uncommon. They cannot function in work, and need time to re-adjust to themselves.

First, such a person is not immediately covered by the Equality Act 2010, as any disability needs to have "lasted or is likely to last for at least twelve months". You haven't established likely yet, simply because you need to undergo tests. So yes, employers at this point could legally discriminate against you because you are not doing your job properly. You've just become deafened remember, thus you've no idea re basic practicalities nevermind anything else.

So lets suppose you have lost your job or can no longer do your job. You would not be eligible for ESA but JSA. You would need to attend the jobcentre regularly, and expected to comply with whatever terms are attached to JSA. With no support. This includes, communication with DWP staff - remember at this point you do not know how to communicate - expected to job hunt. Facilities in Jobcentres include the use of the telephone. So, good luck to the newly deafened person in their first three months figuring out how to do this. And what is more, they are not covered by the Equality Act 2010 to ask for communication support, as the likelihood test for at least twelve months needs establishing. Put more pressure on such a person, and mental health will take a nose dive. That would quite possibly put someone in hospital, and leaving a much bigger issue to solve.

Likewise, say you are newly diagnosed with cancer. Most employers would hopefuly keep you on, except this isn't the real world and discrimination exists (and you would not be covered by law). During the first 3 months, good luck being well enough on chemotherapy etc, to satisfy what is required of you on JSA.

There are several points in there somewhere, including what is National Insurance for? If you take insurance out for anything in life, be it your car, travel or your house - if catastrophe or the unexpected happens then you are insured. The insurer needs to pay up. NI should be no different except it is managed by the government rather than a private company.

My grandparents' generation set up National Insurance, and any history scholar will understand why. Here's an information video from that time (the video subtitles are bad - it is just as inaccessible to me):

There is a lot more I could say, however I am just going to pose a question. Is what the government and media doing okay with you?

First, let it be said I am a social networking geek, I dig technology and innovation. Anyone who has followed me online long enough will get I'm a big user of such tech and always an early adopter. So as far as these glasses go, on a surface level they are a form of social software. They enable the social to happen, more than it is currently. It is good that geeks are innovating such tech and that goes without saying.

On a personal level, I probably would only wear such glasses in limited circumstances - anything on my face drives me nuts. I value my eyesight at peripheral vision, a bit more than I can tend to care about the detail of what's going on in front of me. It is that what allows me feel connected to my environment - I need to know what's going on around me, as I do not get by on environmental sound. Balance might have something to do with it too. My dislike of blinkers is a personal choice, others might feel differently. That I have no qualms about.

However, that's where my praise of this whole thing stops right in its tracks. I do not knock technology that works with a person, the departure happens when technology is used as society's excuse for what amounts of lazyitis, intolerance or projection of the need for conformity.

That is what I want to write about, and what I started to kick off about on Twitter this morning. One thing about Twitter, you have to punctuate what you say, it is limited to 140 characters and it becomes much about what you leave out and don't say (sometimes because it is obvious).

So what am I bothered about? First journalism should not be a form of marketing (yes it is nice to have positive stories), but it is important to have a form of critique and balance. Put this in the context of the BBC, and it becomes more pressing.

The BBC interviewed someone from the the Cinema Exhibitors' Association:

Phil Clapp, "The broad range of audiences do not like going to subtitled films. But it also needs to be said that the needs and wants of disabled or hearing impaired customers are as broad and varied as the needs and wants of the general audience.

BBC reporter, "Yes. Like they want to go on a Friday night."

Phil Clapp, "They do want to go on a Friday night that's true but unfortunately the economics of the industry mean that it's too big a financial hit on the industry to be able to provide that at this moment."

BBC reporter, "So can technology come to the rescue?"

(Note: it does not cost anything more to play a subtitled film).

Yes I know how the majority of society wants me to respond to that: cinemas are losing revenue because people don't like subtitles! Here's an alternative solution! So cool, we have new tech! Lets go all dizzy already, and embrace!

Except I didn't.

Instead I read the rationale was presented as: some people are intolerant towards the other, we cannot do much about that intolerance, thus lets provide something where you are least visible. You as a deaf person are a nuisance, and are costing a multi billion pound industry money. This is the point where I probably stopped listening. Once you start selling tech on the basis that I am a second class citizen, in need of hiding away, forget it. I really do not want to know. And yes, I will kick off about it.

You know, I am not an afterthought or a nuisance. I have every right to go to the cinema on a Friday night too, just like every single hearing person out there. No I am not an inconvenience, nor does the world exist solely for the benefit of hearing people. Our planet is the home for not just certain classes of people, it home for the likes of me too. Deaf people form part of society - deal with it. When it comes to equal citizenship, it is not negotiation territory.

Hearing people are not required to wear headphones so the sound doesn't disturb the rest of the audience. The speakers at the cinema are in full swing. Let it be known, the sound of dialogue often bothers me - I don't make sense of it, and the vibrations can be senseless (at least music comes with a beat). However, I put up with it; you know it is called tolerance of the other.

Instead the analogy that entered my head was: put Black people at the back of the bus, they cannot possibly sit somewhere else because it might offend the sensibilities of white people. And oh, we need to do that because we might lose business because if we don't it might drive white people away. Don't worry, you can still ride the bus (or wear glasses), just we need to make sure you are less visible. Let the ruling majority, rule. Ditto, lets have a rule where we restrict when LGBT are allowed to stay at accommodation, because Oh My God! We might offend straight people who cannot possibly allow their tolerance to stretch that far, thus it could put us out of business.

I likened the rationale given behind glasses to segregation, along the lines of hide people away and to do away with visibility.

(And imagine if the BBC ran a story about a piece of tech due to intolerance towards other minority groups, without questioning it. I can bet there would be a bit more noise than just this lone voice is making).

Get this. Open subtitles are words on a screen. I am not the least bit sorry if it annoys the crap out of you. Get used to it. And to run a story on the rationale we are providing tech because intolerance exists, is well into lost the plot territory.

A cinema is certainly a business venture, and exists to make a profit; thus it could be argued that they should meet the needs of the majority and run with that. Perhaps fit in minority groups, when they are less busy and actually drum up a profit that way. However, pure free market economics does not exist; businesses have constraints put on them all the time. Whether it be a smoking ban indoors, health and safety requirements and equality measures that you are not allowed to discriminate. All have potential economic consequences.

I would argue, if subtitles existed as much as ramps, lifts and so forth - we would not even need this conversation. Accessibility becomes the norm, and people become used to (as they get used to say, wearing a seat belt). The more we hide ourselves, the harder it is going to be to argue otherwise. Like: this is your problem, put the glasses on, be invisible and shut up.

Which is the thing that irks me about this subtitles glasses proposal. Not the fact that the technology here can't do good; of course it can and certainly in more rural areas. However intolerance of the other should never be the driving force in pushing for technology. That should be focused on accessibility, by imbracing inclusion (which in this context leads to less segregation) and acceptance for who you are. However, once we go for the intolerance line, we really are not going to get anywhere.

(There is more I could say about this, however I do not want to confuse the main thrust of my objection).

Update: The Rebuttal has written a blog post which continues the theme above.

Not designed by me. Perhaps a response to a certain deaf organisation who managed to celebrate a major birthday, where d/Deaf people felt they got pissed on and two fingers stuck up at them. Just sayin'.

Update: someone left a message on Facebook, "DELETE THE DEAF!"

If you want to see a bigger version of the above, go here.

Want to create some art? Please do, and lets show the Italians we support them. I will put it here, with full credit.

Hi to you all,

The first day of protest has gone by. Yesterday morning (25th May 2011), there were many of us in SS Apostoli square (Rome - Italy), for the first day of remonstrations. An intense day that has emotionally and professionally drained us.

Many italian Deaf people descended on Rome from extreme north, such as Piedmont, and from the far south in Sicily. We were able to witness presentations by representatives of various Associations, Deaf people in general, various authorities in the research field, and Deaf and hearing parents of Deaf children. For those bystanders that did not know anything about this issue, it became clear that all the prejudices towards Sign Language are unfounded and as spoken and sign languages could naturally and harmoniously cohabit the same space without problems.

We had moment of poetry in sign language, sign singing and young Deaf people drumming away in a magnificent way a show demonstration and a celebration. All this has attracted lots of curious members of the public as well as journalists. A great moment was when I caught the mesmerised eyes of the cameramen and interviewer of TG3 (RAI 3 NEWS - Italian National Broadcasting Television channel) when they eventually managed to take all this in. By the way, the recording is going to be broadcasted today at 19.00 (Italian time) rather than 14.00 as the director liked the full item, rather than the edited version for the earlier edition.

[...] During the morning, in the square, two of the members of the XII Commission for the Social Affairs have joined us, the mover of the original motion, Hon. Gero Grassi (MP), and the Hon. Luciana Pedoto (MP), they both have on side reiterated their support and commitment for the recognition of Sign language and the aim of not allowing any amendment to the proposed text (avoiding any extravagant proposals - LMG or Communication Technique - to replace Italian Sign Language). However on the other hand, they have reflected on the current situation in the commission debate: a number of other members raised the incompatibility of the DDL with the article 6 of the Italian Constitution (regarding the minority languages).

[Art. 6 La Repubblica tutela con apposite norme le minoranze linguistiche. - Art 6 The Republic safeguard the linguistic minorities with specific norms.]

If this is the case, the amended version will have to go back to the Senate for the final approval. The MPs did not necessarily speak to the public but gave their best wishes to the event and communicated with all those authorities (us included) surrounding the stage. Lets see if this is exactly the case. It is clear that in the next week there will be another round of hearings with the commission.

The Hon. Oreste Rossi (Member of the European Parliament - MEP) has updated us about the fact that the European Parliament has recently added, in the guidelines for the next ten years, the recognition of sign languages in the various member states, this new attempt will make more difficult for these countries not to comply with it, even though it might still be possible.

[In the original message the next paragraph is a series of thanks to all that have contributed to the success of the day and to all Deaf and hearing people around Europe and the world that have participated in many different ways and in particular to those that have gathered at the various Italian Embassies making their remonstrations heard.]

But it does not finish here, today (26th May and tomorrow (27th May) there will be more protesting at the front entrance to the Italian Parliament.

Regards
Marcello Cardarelli
President of ANIOS
Translation Marco Nardi

More clips on the following website: www.lissubito.com

With thanks to John Walker.

European Union of the Deaf Youth

European Forum of Sign Language Interpreters
Letter of Support - in Italian [PDF]. And with Google Translate.

World Federation of the Deaf:
WFD expressed its support for the recognition of the Italian sign language

And their letter can be found here [PDF].

World Association of Sign Language Interpreters
Letter of support in Italian [PDF] and Google Translate.

European Union of the Deaf
Letter from the EUD signed by 29 member countries

EUD letter. EUD President Berglind Stefansdottir & Board Member Humberto Insolera officially handed the EUD support letter signed by delegates from 29 EUD member countries to Sebastiano Manciagli, the board member of the Italian Association of the Deaf.

Austrian Deaf Association, Austria:
Letter to the Italian ambassador

British Deaf Association, United Kingdom:
BDA supports recognition of Italian Sign Language (LIS)

Canadian Association of the Deaf
Letter Doug Momotiuk, President CAD and the same letter in French.

The Canadian Association of the Deaf (CAD) strongly supports the recognition of the Italian Sign Language.

Irish Deaf Society, Ireland:
Press Release from the Irish Deaf Society: Vigil at the Italian Embassy, Dublin

German Deaf Association (Deutscher Gehoerlosen-Bund e.V. or DGB)

Letter in support of LIS, in English and a translation in German.

National Association of the Deaf, USA
NAD supports recognition of Italian Sign Language (LIS)

Did I miss an organisation out? Let me know - I will add them. Your national deaf organisation not on this list? Nag them, and ask them to put it online. Ultimately this is an international issue, and Italy has asked the world for support.

London, England

Deaf Protest for Italian Sign Language - Part 1 (video on Sign-Tube)
Deaf Protest for Italian Sign Language - Part 2 (video on Sign-Tube)

A comment from John:

We had a great day today. We were opposite the Italian Embassy from 12noon until 3pm and signed 'LIS YES, LMG NO', with a few drums and rackets to make some noise. Stefania Bella and Marco Nardi, our resident Italians, went to the back gate to hand in the petition and the police were already there to push them out. Luckily two Embassy staff came in and claimed 'they knew all about it'; they were willing to take the petition to the appropriate office. Thanks to Ramas Rentelis and Alison Bryan for their help. We were also filmed by the Hub and See Hear - we should see something on the TV soon.

Hats off to: Stefania Bella, Marco Nardi and Ramas Rentelis and everyone else who protested.

Belfast, Northern Ireland

LIS Protest at the front of City Hall, Belfast (video by Paul Stewart, on Facebook)

Belfast collected an additional 244 paper signatures, from people on the street. And also got the Lord Mayor of Belfast, Councillor Pat Convery to sign the petition!

Hats off to: Lina Cankas, Jamie Rea, Danny Rea, Richard Beattie and that blue eyed fella from Dublin (sorry Lina doesn't remember his full name) , Colette McMahon, Paul Stewart, Rory Mcgee, Éamon James McCaffrey, Bernadette McCaffrey & their wee sweet son, Adam McCormick, Holy Lane, Bar.

Dublin, Ireland

John Bosco Conama at the Italian Embassy in Dublin, "Newsflash ambassador refused to take in letter and petition even after opening them. We re angry and still waiting for an answer!"

Photos by Elizabeth Fitzgerald: Protest for Deaf Italian Community @ Italian Embassy (on Facebook)
Kevin G Mulqueen: Vigil Protesting at Italian Embassy (video on Facebook)
John Bosco Conama: Vigil outside the Italian Embassy, Dublin (video on Facebook)
Elizabeth Fitzgerald: Protest for Deaf Italian Community @ Italian Embassy, Dublin (Facebook)

Hats off to: John Bosco Conama, Irish Deaf Society and everyone who protested.

Berlin, Germany

Hats off to: Ace Seyed-Ali, Rita Mazza and everyone else who protested.

Madrid, Spain

Hats off to: Belén Navas and everyone else who protested.

Washington DC, USA

LIS Protest at the Embassy of ItalyM (photos by Jean Boutcher, on Facebook)

The source of this information is from Robert Mason (on Facebook), which I've edited a bit to suit here (the substance remains the same):

30+ people showed up and made their presence along with a later suprise visit from the NAD CEO Howard Rosenblum; and Chief Operating Officer, Shane Feldman.

One Deaf Italian Gal, Gallaudet student, DODA shared her deep knowledge of what was going on with the Italian legislative process and IMG. She explained that the IMG was on the Italian law books for years until the younger generation demanded that the current law to be formally recognized as the Italian Sign Language, not the Mime and Gesture.

Jason Lamberton, the Yaon (French) and Matt Malzuhun had a conversation with the Consul Attache. The Consular Attache said that Rome did get the messages from DC and other places.

Howard (NAD) told the protestors that the NAD was all behind the international protest.

Hats off to: Jason Lamberton and his co-host Yoan and everyone who protested at Washington DC.

San Francisco, USA

deafbayarea.com: Deaf Protest at the Italian Consulate in San Francisco

Hats off to: Ella Mae Lentz and everyone who showed up in SF yesterday.

Boston, USA

Boston was closed at noon yesterday, but they are supposed to be going today.

The Plan to Petition the Decision on LIS (video by John Pirone).

Video of the protest at the Italian Consulate, Boston

Hats off to: John Pirone and everyone else involved in Massachusetts

Rochester, NY, USA

A staff person was met at the Consulate. More on this later - Patti Durr is going to try and put together her experience later. (If she does, I'll link here - check back)

Hats off to: Patti Durr

Osaka, Japan

Informal meeting with the official representatives at the General Consulate of Italy; in Osaka, Japan.

Hats off to: Emilio Insolera, Hirota Yoshiharu, Danny Gong, Yasunori Shimamoto.

Argentina

I assume this protest was at the Italian Embassy in Buenos Aires.

Hats off to: Argentinian protestors!

Italy

The centre of it all.

News summary in LIS from TG3 (Italian TV). The campaign for LIS is 3 minutes in.

Hats off to: the Italian Deaf Community! We're right behind you.

Do you know any more? That's what the comment box is for.

I had a conversation with a friend in Italy, the motives for LMG is a little more sinister. Members of the upper house were influenced by the organisation representing parents of deaf children and the equivalent to the national health service. They are nervous that money will be diverted from their budgets in order to pay for this decree (it is not equivalent to the 'recognition' we have in the UK, there is money attached to this decree). Their strategy is to replace LIS with LMG.

The key emphasis that is at play here is the letter 'L' in the acronyms:
Lingua (as in LIS) - a language;
Linguaggio (as in LMG) - a pan term to describe all forms of communication including flowers, bees, morse code, gestures, signs, languages etc. I am not sure if we have a direct equivalence in English.

Furthermore, LMG is what signed language was called many years ago as the word 'sign' in Italy did not come close to what we know of signed languages today - it was nearer to display signs. It wasn't until CNR researched the semiotic features of signed language in Italy that the
word of 'signs' came into the dictionary. So the upper house are using an 'old' term for something that is lower classed, vague and without full clarity that the language of deaf people in Italy is a bona fide language.

The change for LMG will lower and water down the original decree.

This explanation shouldn't be misconstrued with 'Sim-Com', as this is not what LMG is. The distinction is closer is the difference between American Sign Language and 'America Visual Communication' - the difference loses the political dimension of a language that represents
a community in Italy.

For those who were asking about the text on the Italian Parliament website, appearing to support LIS:

... there is no actual source to the LMG proposition as it was received as part of a consultation exercise. The report from the consultation hasn't been published yet because the process hasn't finished. It just needs a line to say "any other descriptions of LIS that fall short of a language, eg. LMG, should not be considered.

On the morning of Wednesday 25 May 2011, I got:

Some news from Italy.

They have had some meetings yesterday - I am aware that ANIOS (association of sign language interpreters in Italy) have had their meeting. They were very professional about. The response wasn't as good as they hoped. Their political support were not showing signs of enthusiasm for the decree. FIADDA, NDCS equivalent in Italy, were throwing lots of wild Milan-1880-type comments. Unfortunately it has left seeds of doubt in the MPs' minds, when they are already nervous about their tight budgets. It is doubtful that the decree will go through as it stands and the lower house will dig in their heels.

This news makes the work we are doing even more important to tell the Italian Government that we mean business. Especially as they have more meetings today. ENS (Italian Deaf Association) has their own meeting at some point, not sure when.

And more information from John last night:

The original decree (DDL) has been passed through the Senate and how now returned to the House of Parliament for its first round of consultation. The first people to be consulted were those of medical professions and FIADDA, the organisation representing parents of deaf children. It was here where LMG was raised. The motives for the change is not explicit but we are aware that there are concerns over two issues: the cost of a language law and political pressures from families (Italy has a cultural relationship with 'la familiglia'). FIADDA, in particular, has no interest in signed languages or bilingual education, they advocate only the pure oral method and the normalisation of deaf children. The shift to LMG is politically motivated in order to water down the original decree.

The emphasis for you is the potential impact LMG on the political status of signed languages throughout the world. If we were to reach a situation where LMG was accepted as law, it would create a precedence for other Governments to follow suit. This is the reason for the proactive stance on LMG.

See also:
Press Release from FIADDA Tuscany
Deaf Londoners Preparing for the Protest at the Italian Embassy
Press Release from the Irish Deaf Society: Vigil at the Italian Embassy, Dublin
Note from Terry Riley, Chair BDA to those Protesting
Press Release from the Belfast Protest in Support of the Italian Deaf Community
Italian Embassy Events on Wednesday 25 May 2011
How You Can Support the Italian Deaf Community
Letter to the Italian Parliament from Dr Steven D. Emery
Protest at the Italian Embassy in London this Wednesday
Letter to the Italian Embassy in Dublin by Dr. John Bosco Conama
Italy might as well say: Deaf People use Monkey Language!
International Petition to Support Italy & UK Protest

FIADDA Tuscany onlus
Italian Families Association for the Defense of the Rights of Deafness
Via delle Porte Nuove, 33 - 50144 Florence
tel. / fax 055-3289950 - SMS 339-2497469
http://www.fiaddatoscana.it
info@fiaddatoscana.it

PRESS RELEASE
An initiative illogical choice retrograde

On 13 April 2011, the Social Affairs Committee of the House began consideration of the proposal Law of 4207 (and similar), which recognizes the LIS - Italian sign language - as the language for all purposes and promote its use.

It is very difficult to recognize a language if it is not associated to a community, even spread geographically, but it is incomprehensible how one can define a community based on Common physical presence of a deficit!

The bill promotes the acquisition and use of a sign language gesture passed now by the facts, the results obtained thanks to advances in medicine: neonatal screening, prosthesis or cochlear implant (re) enable speech today to allow deaf people to adequately learn the Italian language and to integrate fully into the social life of their country.

The Italian legal system, in particular with the Law 104/92, it is very advanced level world, with assistance and protection in favor of handicapped people, including those who require the LIS as a means of communication. The real problem is putting into effect the provisions of these rules. Our legislation was not in fact still be able to ensure sufficient territorial distribution of services necessary for the treatment of childhood deafness, despite examples of excellence in this field. Therefore many families have been and still are exhausting forced to travel or even relocate to allow for appropriate intervention health and enabled their children, with all the social and economic costs involved.

In this situation the Italian today decided to focus on and invest in the future of a language of date and will disappear naturally, and even encouraging its use imposing it with the coaching of teachers and educators in LIS schools to children from the very first order, that is just at an age where there is a greater need for an important health intervention and speech therapist and then put at risk the results.

It is also difficult to believe that the bill will not impose new or higher costs for finance public: the heterogeneous distribution of deaf people - 0.04% of the Italian population, 90% with hearing parents - on the national territory will require the creation of a large number of "interpreters LIS "or the reopening of the old special school for" deaf ", with obvious consequences in terms of exclusion.

In conclusion, the FIADDA Tuscany is very concerned that after the recognition of LIS there is only one mechanism to maintain functional deaf people in a state of dependency for the mere purpose economic and power. Deaf people should have full rights and, first of all, the integration as a prerequisite for their growth and emancipation.

Florence, April 14, 2011

FIADDA Tuscany (ONLUS) - Headquarters: Via delle Porte Nuove 33-50144 Florence
cod. fisc. 94116150486 - enrolled in the Regional Volunteer with Act No. 1185 of 02/05/2005
FIADDA (ONLUS) - National President: Banner Street, 175-00188 Rome
Tel / fax. 06 45492150 - e-mail: info@fiadda.it

The main FIADDA website is under construction but there's a bit about them here and pasted below (keep in mind it is outdated - 2005 - but it gives you a flavour of who they are):

FIADDA was founded in 1973 and later spread throughout the Country. Nowadays it can be found in every Italian region.

At a national level it works through a great number of branches sharing common objectives and, at a European level, it is a member Fepeda (Fédération Européenne des Parents d’Enfants Déficients Auditifs) and member of the E.D.F. (European Disability Forum) Board.

Moreover, since July 2000, Fiadda is the seat of the Management and Secretariat of Fepeda.

Since 1986 the Manager of Fiadda, Mrs. Silvana Baroni, is a member of the Permanent Observatory established by means of a Ministry Decree in the framework of the Italian Ministry of Education, for policies concerning the integration of the disabled into mainstream schools.

Since 1990 she also takes part in a Committee set up by the Presidency of the Cabinet at the Ministry for Social Affaires.

In 1994 Fiadda has worked in the framework of the Helios Programme and in the same year it started also the Split programme in the Tide project, regarding the technological research supporting disability, in co-operation with the French association Anpeda and national and European Universities.

Recently, through the Deafnet Project, Fiadda tried to set up a national strategy, supervised by the young deaf, in order to offer new inputs to the association, according to the modern needs.

One thing that really strikes me:
1. They are a parent organisation, thus they will have a deaf child. Parents normally want the best for their children.
2. If the first statement is correct, why are parents rejecting so harshly advice from people THE SAME as their child? To do so, they are also rejecting their child. Perhaps they think that their child, although deaf, is oh so different?!
3. Why do hearing people take it upon themselves to think they know best. Substitute with British history in India, etc. It is called colonalisation, people. Except many are unable to see it, due to whistles, bells and whatnot.

So effectively: Deaf Italians want to own their experience, and want LIS recognised. It is called being political, standing on own two feet and owning your experience. Parents (of deaf children!) come along and kind of start scoulding adults! No you can't have that, sit down and do as you're told. Be a good boy. Ah, paternalism and patronisation at its finest.

To see just how absurd all this is, as a parallel, imagine a parent having a LGBQT child. Instead of being guided by the child and the community around it, it starts on a whole lets take power from you quest. Yep, that's exactly how far behind Deaf rights can be.

I am tweeting about this on @Deaf, follow me there is you want more regular updates. Use the hashtag LISSUBITO if you're joining in the conversation.

And if you've not signed the international petition, you can do so here.

See also:
Deaf Londoners Preparing for the Protest at the Italian Embassy
Press Release from the Irish Deaf Society: Vigil at the Italian Embassy, Dublin
Note from Terry Riley, Chair BDA to those Protesting
Press Release from the Belfast Protest in Support of the Italian Deaf Community
Italian Embassy Events on Wednesday 25 May 2011
How You Can Support the Italian Deaf Community
Letter to the Italian Parliament from Dr Steven D. Emery
Protest at the Italian Embassy in London this Wednesday
Letter to the Italian Embassy in Dublin by Dr. John Bosco Conama
Italy might as well say: Deaf People use Monkey Language!
International Petition to Support Italy & UK Protest

All photo credit: Ramas Rentelis

Hope to see you there? Here are details of the protests / vigil that I know are happening tomorrow (London, Edinburgh, Belfast, Dublin, Washington DC, Berlin).

If you have not done so already, please sign this international petition. It will be handed into the Embassies tomorrow.

See also:
Press Release from the Irish Deaf Society: Vigil at the Italian Embassy, Dublin
Note from Terry Riley, Chair BDA to those Protesting
Press Release from the Belfast Protest in Support of the Italian Deaf Community
Italian Embassy Events on Wednesday 25 May 2011
How You Can Support the Italian Deaf Community
Letter to the Italian Parliament from Dr Steven D. Emery
Protest at the Italian Embassy in London this Wednesday
Letter to the Italian Embassy in Dublin by Dr. John Bosco Conama
Italy might as well say: Deaf People use Monkey Language!
International Petition to Support Italy & UK Protest

At the moment, the Italian government is discussing the enactment of the Italian Sign Language (LIS) bill at the moment. However, a proposal was made to rename the Italian Sign Language as the language of mime and gesture (LMG), in effect reducing and demeaning the status of Italian Sign Language. The Italian Deaf community is horrified by this proposal and wants to protest against this proposal. It has asked the global Deaf community to join the protests. Vigils have been organised in front of Italian embassies in several cities including Belfast, London, Edinburgh, Washington DC and Berlin.

Many Deaf Italian people are rallying in Italy to protest against this proposal. Ms. Elena Radutzky will be speaking in front of the legislature on Tuesday (24 May) and a rally is being organised in Rome on Wednesday, May 25th. About 40,000 people use Irish Sign language
here in Ireland and occurrences such as this one are a serious ramification to our campaign to have Irish Sign Language (ISL) being recognised as a full and official language. So we stand in solidarity with the Italian Deaf community and the global Deaf community.

Below is an extract from Deaf man, Dr. John Bosco Conama’s letter to the Italian ambassador to Ireland:

While if the proposal is carried out by your parliament, it can have wider effects on nations outside Italy. Hence I pen this letter to express my strong concern at this proposal and share concerns with the Italian Deaf community. The proposal is clearly a serious counter to years of research, which confirm that signed languages such as LIS are the genuine languages as spoken languages. The proposal can have unimagined negative effects on the well being of current and future generations of the Italian Deaf community.

The status of the community is frequently determined by the societal and political attitude towards their language. Degrading LIS would bring negative effects on the Italian Deaf community. Should a proposal be adopted, it would be seen as a negative reaction to the
successful conclusion of UN’s convention on rights for disabled people which contains clauses recognising the rights of Deaf people to use their signed languages. (Note: ironically Italy has ratified this convention).

Your country holds an unenviable position where the infamous congress on Deaf education was held in Milan in 1880 and resolutions were passed at this congress calling for the regression of signed languages. These effects of these resolutions are still felt worldwide and this congress is a constant theme in Deaf and cultural studies worldwide. Surely, your country does not want to add on another notoriety to this unenviable position.

Irish Deaf Society
30 Blessington Street,
Dublin 7.

See also:
Note from Terry Riley, Chair BDA to those Protesting
Press Release from the Belfast Protest in Support of the Italian Deaf Community
Italian Embassy Events on Wednesday 25 May 2011
How You Can Support the Italian Deaf Community
Letter to the Italian Parliament from Dr Steven D. Emery
Protest at the Italian Embassy in London this Wednesday
Letter to the Italian Embassy in Dublin by Dr. John Bosco Conama
Italy might as well say: Deaf People use Monkey Language!
International Petition to Support Italy & UK Protest

24th May 2011

To all you who are marching today

Re:

The British Deaf Association is appalled, at the proposed new change in the wording of the legislation being discussed by the Italian Parliament today.. It is not only an insult to sign language but to the Deaf people throughout the world who have fought many battles to get our indigenous sign languages recognised by governments The European Parliament has officially stated and this was reaffirmed only last November In Brussels, and it also reaffirmed and has long since been proven and recognised worldwide that sign language is a language the same as spoken languages. And just as any spoken language, it has its own structure - syntax, linguistics, synonms and morphisms. It’s a rich and living language. To call it anything otherwise is a travesty and a dishonor to all those that use sign languages as their first or preferred language.

TO all those on the March my sincere thanks and appreciation, my only regret is I am unable to join you as I am attending the EUD GA in Budapest, my heart, mind and souls is with you all

Terry Riley
Chair
British Deaf Association

See also:
Press Release from the Belfast Protest in Support of the Italian Deaf Community
Italian Embassy Events on Wednesday 25 May 2011
How You Can Support the Italian Deaf Community
Letter to the Italian Parliament from Dr Steven D. Emery
Protest at the Italian Embassy in London this Wednesday
Letter to the Italian Embassy in Dublin by Dr. John Bosco Conama
Italy might as well say: Deaf People use Monkey Language!
International Petition to Support Italy & UK Protest

to: The Irish News, The Belfast Telegraph, info@u.tv, BBC.

URGENT PRESS RELEASE

World Outcry Against Italian Parliament Bill

There is a bill in the Italian Parliament that was originally going to recognize Italian Sign Language (LIS), but pro-CI/oral "special interests" succeeded in changing the wording that will change LIS to LMG, which is Language of Mimes and Gestures.

The Deaf sign language using community throughout the world are outraged by this insult. It has long since been proven and recognised worldwide that sign language is a language in every sense of the word. Just as any spoken language it has its own structure - syntax, linguistics, synonyms and morphisms.

Tomorrow world wide people from the Deaf and hearing community are gathering in protest.

In Belfast at 16:00 many Deaf people and hearing supporters are meeting at the City Hall to protest and sign a petition against this blatant and deliberate discrimination against the Deaf sign language using community in Italy and around the world. Please support our cause.

Lina Kankeviciute
Chairperson Limepie Theatre and member of Deaf Community
cankaslina (at) gmail (dot) com

See also:
Italian Embassy Events on Wednesday 25 May 2011
How You Can Support the Italian Deaf Community
Letter to the Italian Parliament from Dr Steven D. Emery
Protest at the Italian Embassy in London this Wednesday
Letter to the Italian Embassy in Dublin by Dr. John Bosco Conama
Italy might as well say: Deaf People use Monkey Language!
International Petition to Support Italy & UK Protest